Effect of Growth Stage-based Water Stress on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicon L.) in Semi-arid Regions of Tigray, Ethiopia

Ekubay Tesfay Gebreigziabher *

Department of Natural Resources Research, Shire-Maitsebri Agricultural Research Center, Shire, Tigray, Ethiopia.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Water availability is a major concern in regions with limited water resources. Implementation of best irrigation water management methods can maximize crop yields and irrigation water use efficiency. An experiment was conducted in Laelay Koraro district, Tigray, Ethiopia for two consecutive years (2018 and 2019 off seasons) to investigate the effect of growth stage-based deficit irrigation on tomato yield, yield characteristics and water usage efficiency. The experiment used a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The treatments were three irrigation levels (100%, 50%, and 25% of crop irrigation requirement) and four FAO-defined tomato growth stages (initial, developmental, mid, and late seasons). Data on agronomic parameters and irrigation water were collected and analyzed statistically. The results revealed that reducing irrigation amount by up to 75% during the development growth stage significantly decreased marketable yield by up to 66.5%. However, the highest water use efficiency (9.2kgm-3) was achieved by reducing irrigation amount by 75% at the end-growth stage of tomato. Treatments with the lowest water use efficiency (3.5kgm-3) were those receiving 75% less irrigation amount than the full requirement during the development growth stage. Irrigation deficit up to 75% of the full requirement during tomato development stages greatly affect marketable yield and water use efficiency. Therefore, the tomato crop is highly susceptible to water stress when receiving more than a 50% reduction in full irrigation requirement during its developmental growth stage.

Keywords: Growth Stages, marketable yield, tomato, water use efficiency

How to Cite

Gebreigziabher, Ekubay Tesfay. 2024. “Effect of Growth Stage-Based Water Stress on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Tomatoes (Solanum Lycopersicon L.) in Semi-Arid Regions of Tigray, Ethiopia”. Asian Plant Research Journal 12 (4):48-56. https://doi.org/10.9734/aprj/2024/v12i4261.


Download data is not yet available.


Nangare DD, Singh Y, Kumar PS, Minhas PS. Growth, fruit yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as affected by deficit irrigation regulated on phenological basis. Agricultural Water Management. 2016; 171:73-79.

Kuşçu H., Turhan A, & Demir AO. The response of processing tomato to deficit irrigation at various phenological stages in a sub-humid environment. Agricultural Water Management. 2014;133: 92-103.

Pereira LS., Oweis T. and Zairi A. Irrigation Management under Water Scarcity. Agricultural Water Management. 2002;57:175–206.

Lorite IL, Mateos L, Orgaz F, Fereres. Assessing deficit irrigation strategies at the level of an irrigation district. Agricultural Water Management. 2007;1-3(91):51-60.

Comas LH, Trout TJ, DeJonge KC. Zhang SM, Gleason. Water productivity under strategic growth stage-based deficit irrigation in maize. Agricultural water management. 2019;212:433-440.

Kirda C. Deficit Irrigation Scheduling Based on Plant Growth Stages Showing Water Stress Tolerance. Water Reports, (FAO). 2002;3–10.

Igbadun HE, Salim BA, Tarimo AK, Mahoo HF. Effects of deficit irrigation scheduling on yields and soil water balance of irrigated maize. Irrigation Science. 2008; 27:11-23.

Wang D. Water use efficiency and optimal supplemental irrigation in a high yield wheat field. Field Crops Research.2017;213:213-220.

M'hamed HC, Rezig M, Naceur MB. Water use efficiency of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf) under deficit irrigation. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2015;8(7): 238.

Al-Barrak KM. Water use efficiency in wheat grown under drought conditions. 2006;408-411.

Istanbulluoglu A. Effects of irrigation regimes on yield and water productivity of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under mediterranean climatic conditions. Agricultural Water Management. 2009;96: 1792–1798.

Khapte PS, Kumar P, Burman U, Kumar P. Deficit irrigation in tomato: Agronomical and physio-biochemical implications. Scientia horticulturae. 2019; 248:256-264.

Sujatha G, Kanth BK, Sinha J, Kalyani MS, Lakshmi TV, Srinu M. Comparative Study of the Impact of Saline Water Irrigation on Tomato Yield, Quality and Growth in Andhra Pradesh, India. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science. 2023;35(20):1076-85. Available:https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i203904.

Fahim MM, Helal MG, Sultana T, Habib ZF, Husen MU, Halim A. Growth and Yield Performance of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum L.) at Different Building Heights of Rooftop Gardening. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change. 2023;13(8):1593-605. Available:https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i82109.

Zhang H, Xiong Y, Huang G, Xu X, Huang Q. Effects of water stress on processing tomatoes yield, quality and water use efficiency with plastic mulched drip irrigation in sandy soil of the Hetao Irrigation District. Agricultural Water Management. 2017;179: 205-214.

Al‐Karaki GN. Growth, water use efficiency, and sodium and potassium acquisition by tomato cultivars grown under salt stress. Journal of plant nutrition. 2000;23(1):1-8.

Giuliani MM, Nardella E, Gagliardi A, Gatta G. Deficit irrigation and partial root-zone drying techniques in processing tomato cultivated under Mediterranean climate conditions. Sustainability. 2017; 12(9):2197.

Jiang X, Zhao Y, Tong L, Wang R, Zhao S. Quantitative analysis of tomato yield and comprehensive fruit quality in response to deficit irrigation at different growth stages. HortScience. 2019;54(8): 1409-1417

Mattar MA, Zin El-Abedin TK, Alazba AA, Al-Ghobari HM. Soil water status and growth of tomato with partial root-zone drying and deficit drip irrigation techniques. Irrigation Science.2020;38:163-176.

Girón A, Alcocer C, Espadas F, Talavera C, Estrella H, Chan A, Santamaria JM. Plant water relations. In The papaya: botany, production and uses. Wallingford UK: CABI. 2020;119-129.

Valiantzas JD. Simplified forms for the standardized FAO-56 Penman–Monteith reference evapotranspiration using limited weather data. Journal of Hydrology. 2013;505:13-23.

Allen RG. Smith M., Pereira LS. Raes D, Wright JL. Revised FAO procedures for calculating evapotranspiration: irrigation and drainage paper no. 56 with testing in Idaho. In Watershed Management and Operations Management. 2000;1-10.

Kroetsch D, Wang C. Particle size distribution. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. 2008;2:713-725.

Huluka G, Miller R. Particle size determination by hydrometer method. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin.2014;419:180-184.

Blake GR. and Hartage KH. Methods of Soil Analysis:Bulck Density. 2nd ed. ed. Klute A. Madison Wisconsin USA: American society of agronomy Inc. and soil science society of America Inc. 1986;363-375.

Klute A. Water Retention: Laboratory Methods. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis, ed. A Klute. Madison, Wisconsin: Am. Soc. Agron. 1986;635–662.

Bouwer H. Methods of Soil Analysis:Intake Rate in Cylinder Infiltrometer. 2nd ed. ed. Klute A. Madison Wisconsin USA: American society of agronomy Inc. and soil science society of America Inc. 1986;825-843.

Bender FE. Statistical methods for food and agriculture. CRC Press; 2020.

Clewer AG, Scarisbrick D.H. Practical statistics and experimental design for plant and crop science, John Wiley & Sons.2023

Critchley W, Siegert K, Chapman C, Finket M. Water harvesting: A manual for the design and construction of water harvesting schemes for plant production. Scientific Publishers.2013.

Rosadi RB. Afandi M. Senge KIto &. Adomako JT. Critical water content and water stress coefficient of soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) Under deficit irrigation. Paddy and Water Environment. 2005;3:219-223.